Template:Disputed-inline/doc

Usage

 * or
 * or

Articles with disputed statements
This inline template helps highlight a disputed particular statement or alleged fact, in contrast to the Disputed and Disputed-section templates which mark a whole article or section as disputed. This is particularly helpful when there are reliable sources supporting two or more different claims. Disputed-inline should not be used without also raising the issue on the talk page. When used on an article page, the word "disputed" links to Disputed statement, and the article is placed in Category:Accuracy disputes or one of its dated sub-categories. This template is a more strongly worded version of Dubious, which indicates a potential dispute, most often a question about reliable sourcing for the statement/fact at issue; Disputed-inline indicates that at least one editor believes there is no question that the statement has a verifiability problem.

Other pages
If this tag is used outside the article namespace, it will not be categorized in an article cleanup category, and the word "disputed" links to Consensus. It can be used to indicate an unresolved dispute and a talk page topic about the dispute, e.g. an issue at a guideline or WikiProject page. Disputed-inline should not be used without also raising the issue on the talk page.